WACE Economics hardest topics
Across 10,947 marked attempts on AusGrader, WACE Economics students average 63.6% on questions taken from board external papers. Explain is both the lowest scoring command verb on 70.3% and the costliest, because it carries 41.0% of the paper on its own. These are self-selected users practising when they chose to, not the SCSA cohort under exam conditions.
How to read these numbers
- The figures are AusGrader users' marked attempts, not SCSA results. They corroborate what the board publishes about this subject and do not stand in for it.
- Any cut with fewer than 50 attempts is withheld, which on this page is 3 papers, 39 dot points, 1 question type and 16 verbs. Every figure shown carries its attempt count.
- Scores cover questions mapped to the WACE Economics syllabus from any board's external papers, which is why the sample is larger than the 6 SCSA papers alone. The paper table below is the exception and uses SCSA papers only.
- Internal assessment and school-uploaded exams are excluded throughout, so these averages differ from the ones on WACE Economics performance stats, which count every attempt.
Score by past paper
| Year | Exam | Average | Attempts |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Exam | 64.7% | 225 |
| 2023 | Exam | 77.0% | 72 |
| 2021 | Exam | 65.6% | 69 |
The lowest average belongs to the 2025 Exam on 64.7% from 225 attempts, and the highest to the 2023 Exam on 77.0% from 72 attempts. A paper's average reflects both how hard it was and who chose to sit it, so treat the spread as a guide to which papers make demanding practice.
Score by question type
| Question type | Average | Attempts |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple choice | 62.9% | 10,541 |
| Short answer | 67.0% | 388 |
Score by unit
| Unit | Average | Attempts |
|---|---|---|
| Unit 4: Macroeconomic theory and economic policy | 61.3% | 6,831 |
| Unit 3: Australia and the global economy | 67.6% | 4,182 |
An attempt counts once per unit, so a question assessed across two units appears in both rows and the column adds to slightly more than 10,947.
The priority list: heavy topics with low scores
| Topic | Share of marks | Average | Attempts | Marks at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Economic knowledge and understanding (Unit 4) | 39.6% | 62.5% | 5,769 | 14.8 |
| Economic knowledge and understanding (Unit 3) | 45.3% | 68.8% | 3,969 | 14.1 |
| Economic skills (Unit 4) | 8.7% | 56.4% | 1,573 | 3.8 |
| Economic skills (Unit 3) | 6.5% | 56.2% | 546 | 2.9 |
The topic list is close: 14.8 against 14.1 marks at risk separates first from second, so topic choice alone will not order revision. The dot-point list below spreads further.
The same cut at subtopic level
| Subtopic | Share of marks | Average | Attempts | Marks at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal policy | 11.6% | 63.8% | 1,648 | 4.2 |
| Monetary policy | 10.3% | 67.4% | 1,398 | 3.4 |
| Balance of payments | 7.4% | 57.8% | 1,115 | 3.1 |
| Australia’s international trade | 7.2% | 57.8% | 90 | 3.0 |
| Terms of trade | 6.2% | 54.5% | 467 | 2.8 |
| The aggregate demand and aggregate supply models | 5.5% | 56.3% | 1,374 | 2.4 |
| Exchange rates | 8.4% | 72.7% | 782 | 2.3 |
| Free trade and protection | 8.9% | 78.7% | 1,056 | 1.9 |
| Labour productivity | 7.3% | 74.6% | 659 | 1.9 |
| Foreign investment | 7.2% | 78.9% | 493 | 1.5 |
| Australia’s macroeconomic performance and the business cycle | 2.9% | 58.9% | 693 | 1.2 |
| The aggregate expenditure model | 2.0% | 53.7% | 670 | 0.9 |
The same cut at dot-point level
| Dot point | Content | Share of marks | Average | Attempts | Marks at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2.0.3 | use microeconomic models to analyse and convey economic theory and reasoning in relation to Australia’s international transactions, including the Production Possibility Frontier (PPF) model; the demand and supply model; the theories of absolute and comparative advantage | 3.1% | 60.4% | 223 | 1.2 |
| 3.1.3.1 | the concept and structure of Australia’s balance of payments | 2.3% | 51.5% | 451 | 1.1 |
| 3.1.2.3 | the benefits of trade liberalisation | 3.1% | 67.7% | 219 | 1.0 |
| 3.1.3.3 | the reasons for Australia’s current account balance in terms of the factors influencing the trade balance; the income balance | 2.4% | 59.4% | 865 | 1.0 |
| 4.2.0.4 | select and/or use economic information and data to identify trends and relationships in relation to Australia’s economic policy and management; analyse macroeconomic issues and events; make predictions on Australia’s economic policy and management; link economic theory to contemporary macroeconomic events and issues; justify a conclusion | 2.1% | 55.2% | 59 | 0.9 |
| 4.1.3.5 | the impact of changes in aggregate demand and aggregate supply on the equilibrium level of income/output using the AD/AS model | 2.4% | 60.9% | 637 | 0.9 |
| 4.1.4.7 | the impact of expansionary and contractionary fiscal policy stances on the level of economic activity using the AE and AD/AS model | 2.9% | 68.2% | 446 | 0.9 |
| 3.1.5.6 | effects of movements in the exchange rate | 3.1% | 71.7% | 79 | 0.9 |
| 4.1.5.6 | the impact of expansionary and contractionary monetary policy stances on the level of economic activity using the AE and AD/AS model | 2.8% | 69.6% | 243 | 0.8 |
| 4.1.4.5 | methods of financing a budget deficit and the impact of government debt | 1.4% | 45.7% | 224 | 0.8 |
| 3.1.2.6 | the impact of tariffs and subsidies using the demand and supply model on trade, market efficiency and the macroeconomy | 3.2% | 76.7% | 609 | 0.8 |
| 3.1.4.2 | factors that affect the terms of trade, including changes in commodity prices | 1.5% | 52.5% | 219 | 0.7 |
| 4.1.1.2 | the relationship between the business cycle and economic indicators | 1.7% | 61.1% | 662 | 0.7 |
| 3.1.5.5 | the factors that affect the exchange rate | 2.5% | 74.1% | 694 | 0.7 |
| 4.1.4.3 | the different budget outcomes, i.e. balanced, surplus and deficit budgets | 1.1% | 48.6% | 464 | 0.6 |
| 4.1.5.7 | strengths and weaknesses of monetary policy | 1.8% | 68.5% | 236 | 0.6 |
| 4.1.3.3 | the long-run aggregate supply (LRAS) curve and factors that can cause shifts of the LRAS curve | 1.1% | 49.1% | 460 | 0.6 |
| 3.2.0.2 | apply mathematical techniques relevant to international trade, including calculating Australia’s trade intensity; opportunity cost ratios; balance of payments data, including balance on goods and services, income balance, current account balance; the terms of trade index; the exchange rate | 1.1% | 52.1% | 280 | 0.5 |
| 4.1.5.5 | how changes in the cash rate affects the level of economic activity, i.e. the transmission mechanism | 1.4% | 63.7% | 485 | 0.5 |
| 4.1.1.1 | the causes and turning points of the business cycle | 0.9% | 48.7% | 226 | 0.5 |
Which command verbs cost the most marks
| Verb | Share of marks | Average | Attempts | Marks at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| explain | 41.0% | 70.3% | 184 | 12.2 |
| describe | 27.7% | 76.3% | 72 | 6.6 |
Explain is both the lowest average at 70.3% and the costliest verb at 12.2 marks per 100, because it carries 41.0% of the paper. Each verb above is practised in the WACE Economics question bank, where the marking criteria show what SCSA expects the answer to do.
What this does not measure
Where to practise
Work the priority list from the top: Economic knowledge and understanding (Unit 4) and Economic knowledge and understanding (Unit 3) first, then the dot points above. Each topic page holds real SCSA questions with marking criteria attached. For what the papers actually cover, read WACE Economics most tested topics.
Frequently asked questions
Which WACE Economics past paper do students score lowest on?
The 2025 Exam, averaging 64.7% across 225 marked attempts on AusGrader. The 2023 Exam is the highest on 77.0%.
Which WACE Economics dot points give the best return on revision time?
3.2.0.3 (1.2 marks at risk per 100), 3.1.3.1 (1.1 marks at risk per 100) and 3.1.2.3 (1.0 marks at risk per 100). Marks at risk combines a dot point's share of paper marks with the marks students drop on it, so it ranks by recoverable marks and not by score alone.
How many attempts is each WACE Economics figure based on?
10,947 marked attempts overall, with the per-row count shown in every table. Any cut below 50 attempts is withheld instead of published.
Do these averages show how the SCSA cohort performed?
No. They are AusGrader users' marked attempts, a self-selected group practising when they chose to and often without exam timing. They corroborate what SCSA publishes about this subject and do not replace it.
Sources
- AusGrader marking data, WACE Economics, AusGrader. 10,947 marked attempts on questions from board external papers, by self-selected AusGrader users. Not a SCSA cohort.
- ATAR Economics Course Examination, SCSA, 2025. Source of the mark weightings behind every marks-at-risk column, across 6 papers from 2020 to 2025 and 820 marks. Dot-point numbering follows the current SCSA Economics syllabus.
Syllabus and assessment material referenced in this guide is used under licence, © School Curriculum and Standards Authority. See our SCSA licensing notice. The School Curriculum and Standards Authority does not endorse this publication or product.
Keep reading
Practise what you just read
Work through real SCSA Economics questions and get your written answers marked against the official criteria, instantly.