VCAA Accounting Budgeting and decision-making
12 sample questions with marking guides and sample answers · Avg. score: 100%
Read Case study 2 (Stimulus 2, 3 and 4) in the stimulus book.
Use Stimulus 2 and 3 to prepare a fully classified Statement of Profit or Loss for the years ended 30 June 2024 and (projected) 30 June 2025.
Health Foods
Statement of Profit or Loss for year ended 30 June
| Particulars | 2025 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
Reveal Answer
Health Foods
Statement of Profit or Loss for year ended 30 June
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Sales | 78 000 | 60 000 | ||||
| Less Cost of sales | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 19 550 | 17 000 | ||||
| Gross profit | 58 450 | 43 000 | ||||
| Add Other Revenue | ||||||
| Interest revenue | 790 | 790 | 790 | 790 | ||
| 59 240 | 43 790 | |||||
| Less Other Expenses | ||||||
| Selling Expenses | ||||||
| Advertising | 2 331 | 2 331 | ||||
| Delivery vehicle expenses | 3 663 | 3 663 | ||||
| Depreciation on delivery vehicles | 1 021 | 1 021 | ||||
| Website maintenance | 666 | 7 681 | 666 | 7 681 | ||
| Administrative Expenses | ||||||
| Bookkeeping expenses | 1 665 | 1 665 | ||||
| Depreciation on computer equipment | 1 000 | 1 000 | ||||
| Electricity | 4 650 | 4 650 | ||||
| Insurance | 555 | 555 | ||||
| Wages — office staff | 20 000 | 27 870 | 20 000 | 27 870 | ||
| Finance Expenses | ||||||
| Interest on loan | 821 | 821 | 821 | 821 | ||
| Total Expenses | 36 372 | 36 372 | ||||
| Net profit | 22 868 | 7 418 |
Classification Headings
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly presents 4 classification headings | 3 |
Correctly presents 2–3 classification headings | 2 |
Correctly presents 1 classification heading | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Account Classification & Amounts
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for all 13 accounts for both years | 5 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 9–12 accounts for both years | 4 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 6–8 accounts for both years | 3 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 3–5 accounts for both years | 2 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 1–2 accounts for both years | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Sub-totals
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly calculates 4 sub-totals for both years | 2 |
Correctly calculates 1–3 sub-totals for both years | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Profit
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly determines gross profit figures for both years | 1 |
Determines net profit figures for both years | 1 |
Use Stimulus 2 and 3 to prepare a fully classified Statement of Financial Position for the years ended 30 June 2024 and (projected) 30 June 2025.
Health Foods
Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June
| Particulars | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
Reveal Answer
Health Foods
Statement of Financial Position as at 30 June
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | $ | |
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current assets | ||||||||
| Cash at bank | 36 889 | 14 000 | ||||||
| Inventories | 5 800 | 42 689 | 5 800 | 19 800 | ||||
| Non-current assets | ||||||||
| Property, plant and equipment | ||||||||
| Computer equipment | 2 500 | 2 500 | ||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation on computer equipment | 2 200 | 300 | 1 200 | 1 300 | ||||
| Delivery vehicles | 45 000 | 45 000 | ||||||
| Less Accumulated depreciation on delivery vehicles | 9 521 | 35 479 | 35 779 | 78 468 | 8 500 | 36 500 | 37 800 | 57 600 |
| Liabilities | ||||||||
| Current liabilities | ||||||||
| A/c payable | 5 290 | 5 290 | 5 290 | 5 290 | ||||
| Non-current liabilities | ||||||||
| Loan due 30 June 2030 | 7 000 | 7 000 | 12 290 | 7 000 | 7 000 | 12 290 | ||
| Net assets | 66 178 | 45 310 | ||||||
| Owner’s equity | ||||||||
| Capital | 45 310 | 39 892 | ||||||
| Add Net profit | 22 868 | 7 418 | ||||||
| 68 178 | 47 310 | |||||||
| Less drawings | 2 000 | 66 178 | 2 000 | 45 310 |
Classifications
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly presents 5 classifications | 4 |
Correctly presents 4 classifications | 3 |
Correctly presents 2–3 classifications | 2 |
Correctly presents 1 classification | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Account Classification & Amounts
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for all 10 accounts for both years | 5 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 8–9 accounts for both years | 4 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 5–7 accounts for both years | 3 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 3–4 accounts for both years | 2 |
Correctly classifies accounts and accurately records amounts for 1–2 accounts for both years | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Balancing
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly balances the Statement of Financial Position for both years | 1 |
Using Stimulus 2 and 3 and your responses to Questions 12a) and 12b), calculate the following ratios for 30 June 2024 and projected ratios for 30 June 2025.
Calculations should be rounded to two decimal places.
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Gross profit ratio | ||
| Net profit ratio | ||
| Return on owner’s equity | ||
| Current ratio |
Reveal Answer
| 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Gross profit ratio | ||
| 74.94% | 71.67% | |
| Net profit ratio | ||
| 29.32% | 12.36% | |
| Return on owner’s equity | ||
| 41.02% | 17.41% | |
| Current ratio | ||
| 8.07:1 | 3.74:1 |
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly calculates 4 ratios for both years | 4 |
Correctly calculates 3 ratios for both years | 3 |
Correctly calculates 2 ratios for both years | 2 |
Correctly calculates 1 ratio for both years | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Using Stimulus 2, 3 and 4 and your responses to Questions 12a), 12b) and 12c), advise Tamara on how to convince Health in Your Kitchen to buy her business.
Reveal Answer
Owing to the projected increases in sales of 30% and cost of goods sold of 15%, Tamara’s gross profit is estimated to increase from 71.67% to 74.94% or by $15 450 in 2025. This reaches the benchmark of 75%. There is also a very pleasing increase in net profit from $7 418 to a projected $22 868 or from 12.36% in 2024 to 29.32% in 2025. Once again, these compare favourably with the current benchmark of 30%.
With the ROE of 17.41% increasing to 41.02% and the current ratio increasing from 3.74:1 to 8.07:1, the benchmark results of 40% and 2:1 respectively have been easily met. The ROE shows a healthy return and the level of the current ratio suggests the business is well able to meet its debts in the short term. With the cash balance of $36 889, Tamara could consider repaying the loan of $7 000 before the due date.
The expenses are projected to remain constant at 2024 levels. Tamara’s results are excellent overall and represent an outstanding opportunity for a ‘bricks and mortar’ business to acquire a profitable and growing ‘online’ business in order to diversify and expand.
Discussion of Ratios
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Discusses 4 ratios | 4 |
Discusses 3 ratios | 3 |
Discusses 2 ratios | 2 |
Discusses 1 ratio | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Advice
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Provides justified advice regarding the sale of her business | 1 |
Statement of Cash Flows (extract)
| 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash flows from operating activities | |||
| Receipts from customers | 4 601 235 | 4 448 735 | 4 520 184 |
| Payments to suppliers | –1 752 378 | –1 716 713 | –1 744 982 |
| Payments to employees | –1 811 978 | –1 540 181 | –1 463 172 |
| Interest and other costs of finance | –18 458 | –7 565 | –14 162 |
| Income taxes paid | –98 000 | –80 306 | –79 448 |
| Net cash flows from operating activities | 920 421 | 1 103 970 | 1 218 420 |
| Cash flow ratio | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.27 |
A trend analysis of the extract of Statement of Cash Flows indicates
a failure to tighten credit policies
a reduction in the amount owing to lenders
an increase in the number of staff employed and/or wage rates
an improvement in the business’s ability to meet long-term debts
Reveal Answer
a failure to tighten credit policies
Receipts from customers actually increased in the most recent year (2022). Without total sales figures to calculate accounts receivable turnover, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that credit policies have failed.
a reduction in the amount owing to lenders
Interest and finance costs increased significantly in 2022 (from 7,565 to 18,458), which suggests an increase in debt levels or interest rates rather than a reduction in the amount owing.
an increase in the number of staff employed and/or wage rates
The data shows a substantial and consistent increase in 'Payments to employees' over the three years (from 1,463,172 to 1,811,978), which is directly caused by hiring more staff or increasing wage rates.
an improvement in the business’s ability to meet long-term debts
The cash flow ratio decreased steadily from 0.27 to 0.20, and net operating cash flows declined, indicating a deterioration rather than an improvement in the ability to service debts.
Gross profit and net profit ratios are above industry benchmarks for Company A, and credit sales have increased by 20% on the previous year. However, the net cash flows from operating activities have decreased. This is because
cost of goods sold has increased.
payment of dividends has increased.
inflows have increased proportionally more than outflows.
customers buying on credit are not paying their accounts on time.
Reveal Answer
cost of goods sold has increased.
An increase in the cost of goods sold would typically lower the gross profit ratio, which contradicts the scenario stating that profit ratios are above industry benchmarks.
payment of dividends has increased.
Dividend payments are generally classified as financing activities, not operating activities, so they would not cause a decrease in net cash flows from operating activities.
inflows have increased proportionally more than outflows.
If cash inflows increased proportionally more than outflows, the net cash flow would increase, which contradicts the statement that net cash flows have decreased.
customers buying on credit are not paying their accounts on time.
Credit sales are recorded as revenue (increasing profit) immediately, but cash is only received when customers pay; if collections are slow, accounts receivable rise and operating cash flow decreases despite high profitability.
A bakery supplies local schools and businesses with freshly baked goods. The owner of the bakery is looking at improving the performance of the business and is considering contributing a further $150 000 cash.
The business has experienced cash flow problems in recent years. It has a bank loan of $220 000, of which both the principal amount and the interest are being repaid over the next four years.
Key financial indicators include:
Return on Owner’s Investment (ROI) 15%
Gross Profit Margin (GPM) 65%
Net Profit Margin (NPM) 22%
Debt Ratio 45%
Quick Asset Ratio (QAR) 0.85:1
The owner is considering two options:
- Option A – expanding inventory lines by redeveloping the kitchen area and employing an extra staff member to assist in the kitchen and with deliveries
- Option B – reducing the bank loan by $150 000
With reference to the key financial indicators, explain the impact each option would likely have on the performance of the business.
Reveal Answer
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Comprehensive response that explains the impact of both Option A and Option B on the performance of the business, with accurate and detailed reference to multiple key financial indicators (e.g., ROI, NPM, Debt Ratio, QAR) for each option. | 6 |
Thorough response that explains the impact of both options on the performance of the business, with accurate reference to key financial indicators, though lacking the depth of a 6-mark response. | 5 |
Sound response that explains the impact of both options with some reference to financial indicators, OR provides a thorough explanation of only one option. | 4 |
Basic response that explains the impact of the options, with limited or partially accurate reference to financial indicators. | 3 |
Limited response that provides a superficial explanation of the options, or a basic explanation of only one option. | 2 |
Very limited response that identifies a valid point about one of the options or a financial indicator. | 1 |
No valid response. | 0 |
| EBITDA ($m) for XYZ Company Ltd | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
| NSW | 415.3 | 298.2 | 499.5 | 374.7 | 511.9 |
| QLD | 420.7 | 566.7 | 320.6 | 479.8 | 507.3 |
| WA | 354.6 | 323.4 | 399.5 | 465.4 | 499.2 |
Which statement is correct?
Western Australia had a 43% growth in EBITDA from 2018 to 2020.
XYZ Company Ltd had the most unstable EBITDA trend in 2018.
New South Wales had a 28% EBITDA result from 2017 to 2018.
Queensland had a total EBITDA of $578.8 m from 2017 to 2021.
Reveal Answer
Western Australia had a 43% growth in EBITDA from 2018 to 2020.
Western Australia's EBITDA grew from $323.4m in 2018 to $465.4m in 2020. The percentage growth is calculated as , or roughly , which aligns with the option.
XYZ Company Ltd had the most unstable EBITDA trend in 2018.
Stability is not clearly defined by a single metric in the table, and total company EBITDA remained relatively flat between 2017 ($1,190.6m) and 2018 ($1,188.3m). Without a specific definition or calculation, this subjective statement cannot be confirmed as the correct answer.
New South Wales had a 28% EBITDA result from 2017 to 2018.
New South Wales experienced a decrease in EBITDA from 2017 to 2018. The calculation indicates a decline, not a positive result.
Queensland had a total EBITDA of $578.8 m from 2017 to 2021.
The total EBITDA for Queensland from 2017 to 2021 is the sum of all years (), which equals $2,295.1m, significantly higher than $578.8m.
Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 4–6) in the stimulus book.
Bus Company has gradually expanded its fleet to increase the number of routes it can cover. In the financial year ended 30 June 2019, the company finalised its purchase of offices across Queensland. In the 2019–2020 financial year, it completed the expansion of its Queensland routes. The company’s Board of Directors wants to determine the impact of expanding operations into New South Wales.
Evaluate the company’s financial stability in order to support its future expansion.
Propose recommendations for the future operations and direction of the business.
Reveal Answer
A purchase of bank bonds for $99 970 is reflected in non-current assets and the cash flow. This money could have been used to reduce operating costs, attract more passengers and improve profitability.
Deferred tax assets have appeared in 2020. These will offset future tax debts and reduce cash outflows in a future period.
The business has purchased ($145 570) and sold ($62 670) property, plant and equipment during the year, reflecting the expansion of its fleet and offices.
The business is highly geared at 75% against the industry benchmark of 60%, so it would need to issue shares and pay down debt. Finance costs have been growing, supporting the interpretation of the business being highly geared.
Income from operations has dropped by $98 830 from 2019 (see cash receipts from customers, which have reduced by $147 530). Borrowings have increased by $1 156 000. One share issue raised $310 460, so another share issue may be needed to increase cash flow. The share issue has been put towards paying off existing borrowings. More borrowings were needed to help meet the cost of payments for other deposits and for purchases of property, plant and equipment. The current ratio and acid test for the business are below the industry average, indicating liquidity issues.
The company must focus on consolidation in Queensland as a priority before expansion. It should show improvements in liquidity and gearing. Expansion requires extensive capital expenditure with high risk, particularly when considering the drop in operating cash inflows.
Analysis
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Clearly explains the scenario, supports this explanation with relevant financial data and information | 5 |
Explains the scenario, refers to relevant financial data and information | 4 |
Explains the scenario, refers to financial data or information | 3 |
Makes a statement about the scenario, refers to financial data or information | 2 |
Makes a statement about the scenario | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Recommendations
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
States valid recommendations, supports these recommendations with relevant financial data and information | 4 |
States a valid recommendation, supports this recommendation with financial data or information | 3 |
States a recommendation | 2 |
Infers a recommendation | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
A times interest earned ratio is used
to measure a business’s fixed debt obligations on lease payments.
by lenders to ascertain whether a business can afford additional debt.
to count net earnings against total outstanding shares over a fixed period of time.
to measure financial leverage indicating the degree to which a firm’s operations are funded by equity.
Reveal Answer
to measure a business’s fixed debt obligations on lease payments.
This description aligns better with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, which includes lease payments, whereas the Times Interest Earned ratio focuses specifically on interest expense.
by lenders to ascertain whether a business can afford additional debt.
Lenders use this solvency ratio to evaluate a company's ability to pay interest expenses from its operating income, helping determine the risk associated with lending additional funds.
to count net earnings against total outstanding shares over a fixed period of time.
This describes Earnings Per Share (EPS), which measures profitability per share, not the ability to service debt interest.
to measure financial leverage indicating the degree to which a firm’s operations are funded by equity.
This describes a capital structure ratio like the Debt-to-Equity ratio; TIE measures the ability to service debt interest, not the specific proportion of operations funded by equity.
Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 7–8) in the stimulus book.
In 2019, Business 3 expanded into India.
Using Stimulus 7, evaluate the profitability of Business 3 for the year ended 30 June 2021. Propose recommendations regarding the future operations and direction of the business.
Reveal Answer
Operating profit has increased by $47 467 since 2020, indicating that the expansion into India was positive. An increase in marketing expenses and a 102.74% increase in sales is consistent with this, indicating that current marketing strategies have been effective.
Control over gross profit is reflected by a relatively constant gross profit ratio of 47.98% and 50.34%. While the cost of sales has increased by $57 425 from 2020 to 2021, as a proportion of sales, it has improved in 2021.
The significant increase in interest income from 2020 to 2021 could allow funding for future strategies to increase market share in India.
EPS increased 14.34 cents per share in 2021, so for every issued share, more earnings are made by shareholders. This is consistent with the company’s increasing profitability.
Another factor that had an impact on profit included an increase in total assets from $95 463 in 2019 to $240 859 in 2021. This aligns with an increased potential to generate revenue from an increased asset base, and with the company’s expansion into India. There has also been an increase in the tax expense, which is in line with increasing profitability.
The marked upward trend in profitability indicates that an increase in the Indian market share, without compromising the Australian market share, would be beneficial. The expansion has had a positive outcome for the company. The company should maintain its successful control over its cost of sales and continue with its highly effective marketing strategies.
Analysis
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Clearly explains the scenario; supports this explanation with relevant financial data and information | 5 |
Explains the scenario; refers to relevant financial data and information | 4 |
Explains the scenario; refers to financial data or information | 3 |
Makes a statement about the scenario; refers to financial data or information | 2 |
Makes a statement about the scenario or refers to financial data or information | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors. | 0 |
Recommendation
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Makes clear decisions to propose valid recommendations; supports these recommendations with relevant financial data and information | 4 |
States a valid recommendation; supports this recommendation with financial data or information | 3 |
States a recommendation | 2 |
Infers a recommendation | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors. | 0 |
Analyse Stimulus 8 using trend analysis to determine the business’s stability and liquidity.
Reveal Answer
The principal source of cash is derived from operations ($77 036 in 2021, $24 986 in 2020 and $33 315 in 2019) against net cash flows of $72 484 in 2021, $13 138 in 2020 and $17 516 in 2019.
The cash generating power ratio of .97 is ahead of the industry benchmark of .65, indicating that cash flow from operations contributes at a level that is significantly higher than cash inflows from investing and financing to cash reserves. There is a trend of staying ahead of the industry benchmark. Of the total receipts from customers, 25% are converted to operating cash flows.
The trend shows that from entry into India in 2019 to the latest results, the operating cash flow ratio has significantly improved, with the increase from 0.06 to 0.25 showing improved liquidity. The net cash flow dollar result supports this conclusion, with $77 036 being an increase of $43 722 from 2019, when the company started in India.
The company is benefiting from past investments in Listed Investments ($12 169 in 2020 and $16 226 in 2019), with interest income increasing.
With its performance ahead of industry benchmarks, the business is in a good financial position in terms of its liquidity, and the growth in receipts from customers supports its stability.
Analysis
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Clearly explains the scenario; supports this explanation with relevant financial data and information | 5 |
Explains the scenario; refers to relevant financial data and information | 4 |
Explains the scenario; refers to financial data or information | 3 |
Makes a statement about the scenario; refers to financial data or information | 2 |
Makes a statement about the scenario or refers to financial data or information | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors. | 0 |
Conclusion
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
States a valid conclusion; supports this conclusion with relevant financial data and information | 3 |
States a conclusion about the liquidity or stability of the company; supports this conclusion with financial data and information | 2 |
States a conclusion about the liquidity or stability of the company | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors. | 0 |
Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 5–6) in the stimulus book.
Use horizontal analysis to analyse and evaluate the financial data and information. Make recommendations to the board of directors about whether they should progress with the expansion.
Reveal Answer
XYZ Catering Company’s net profit has decreased to $59 173 in 2023. Total revenue increased by 1.35%, while expenses increased by 1.98%. This has resulted in a decrease of 13 cents in EPS and ROE decreasing from 18.2% to 16.2%.
The 84.3% decrease in Other income from $3 254 to $511 has negatively impacted profitability. Reasons could include a reduction in interest revenue due to decreases in cash and equivalents, and/or financial asset investments.
If the expansion proceeds, inventories costs may increase significantly to stock the additional equipment. Liquidity should not be negatively impacted, as inventories could be funded from cash and cash equivalents.
Trade and other receivables have increased $23 102. Further credit sales could increase the risk of bad debts. If liquidity and cash flow are not monitored closely, payment of trade and other payables, which have increased $22 466, could be further impacted.
If equipment is sold, as well as leased, the possible decrease in lease revenue could be offset somewhat if the business moves into repairs and maintenance of equipment that has been sold.
The board should proceed with the expansion, especially given the success of the trial. Once established, additional sales should increase net profit. The introduction of a tight credit policy is recommended to ensure prompt payment is received from trade and other receivables. This should result in an improved cash position, a reduction in bad debts and the ability to pay trade and other payables in a timely manner to maintain an excellent business reputation.
Notes
Valid: sound, well-founded; legitimate and able to be supported.
Relevant financial data and information may include:
Profitability
- net profit ratio
- NP/net sales x 100
- 2023:
- 2024:
- ROE: is provided in stimulus
Liquidity
- Current ratio
- 2023:
- 2024:
- Turnover of a/c receivable
- 2024: times or 99 days approximately
Stability
- Equity: 45%
- Liabilities: 55%
Other relevant relationships/trends/ratios may include:
- current tax receivables increased by 169.26% or $2 544
- investment in joint ventures increased by 331.94% or $12 741
- PPE increased by 18.48% or $10 245
- intangibles increased by 5.34% or $6 131
- trade and other payables increased by 6.1% or $22 466
- borrowings increased by 65.81% or $8 447
- or other suitable response consistent with a reasonable understanding.
Analysis
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Provides a detailed horizontal analysis of the scenario; supports this analysis with relevant financial data and information from Stimulus 5 and 6; provides valid and justified decisions; proposes two valid recommendations; supports these two recommendations with relevant financial data and information | 5 |
Provides a horizontal analysis of the scenario; refers to relevant financial data and information from Stimulus 5 and 6; provides a valid decision; proposes two valid recommendations; supports these two recommendations with financial data and information | 4 |
Explains the scenario; refers to financial data or information from Stimulus 5 and 6; provides a valid decision; proposes a valid recommendation; supports this recommendation with financial data or information | 3 |
Makes a statement about the scenario; refers to financial data or information from Stimulus 5 or 6; makes a decision; proposes a recommendation | 2 |
Makes a statement about the scenario; states a recommendation or decision | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above. | 0 |
Decisions
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
provides valid and justified decisions | 5 |
provides a valid decision | 4 |
provides a valid decision | 3 |
makes a decision | 2 |
states a recommendation or decision | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
The shareholder equity ratio is used by external stakeholders to determine
the extent to which a company’s profit is affected by shareholder contributions.
the total amount owed to shareholders on liquidation.
how much of a company’s assets shareholders own.
the return on dividends provided to shareholders.
Reveal Answer
the extent to which a company’s profit is affected by shareholder contributions.
This option describes profitability metrics like Return on Equity (ROE), whereas the shareholder equity ratio is a solvency ratio that measures financial leverage rather than profit sensitivity.
the total amount owed to shareholders on liquidation.
The ratio expresses a percentage or proportion of financing, not a total monetary amount. Additionally, the book value of equity used in this ratio rarely equals the actual cash value realized during liquidation.
how much of a company’s assets shareholders own.
The shareholder equity ratio is calculated as , which indicates the proportion of the company's assets that are financed by shareholders (owned free of debt) rather than by creditors.
the return on dividends provided to shareholders.
This refers to metrics like dividend yield or the dividend payout ratio. The shareholder equity ratio analyzes the balance sheet structure, not the returns generated from dividends.
Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 4) in the stimulus book.
The Supermarket Company is considering expansion through the purchase of local grocery stores in regional Queensland towns in the next financial year. The board of directors has approached you with their comparative financial statements for analysis and evaluation, and is seeking your advice on the feasibility of the proposed expansion plans.
Using four relevant ratios, analyse and interpret the liquidity of The Supermarket Company across the financial years 2022 and 2023. Show your working for the ratio calculations.
Reveal Answer
Current ratio
Current assets/current liabilities
Quick Asset ratio:
Current assets –(Inventories + Prepayments)/current liabilities
Turnover of inventories
CoGS/Av inventories
times p.a. or days
times p.a. or days
A/c Receivable turnover
Net Credit Sales/Av Accts Receivable
times p.a. or days
times p.a. or days
Total sales have decreased from $1 676 801 in 2022 to $1 256 621 in 2023 — a decrease of 25%. Further, there has been a decline in the rate of collection of cash from credit customers from 30 days in 2022 to 42 days in 2023. This signifies serious issues with the credit policies of the business. The turnover of inventories has increased from 25 days (2022) to 43 days (2023), indicating that inventories are taking longer to sell.
Current ratios are below the benchmark of 2:1 and worsening, with a decrease from 1.31 in 2022 to 1.16 in 2023. This indicates a poor ability to cover current debts with current assets, especially with accounts receivable collections slower and interest bearing short-term liabilities increasing.
The Quick ratio has also worsened from 2022 to 2023, reflecting increasing inability to meet immediate debts and results are less than the benchmark of 1:1. This reflects the drop in current assets, notably accounts receivables, while current liabilities have increased since 2022. There has been an increase in cash and cash equivalents, but that would seem to have been influenced by the sale of $10 500 in investments and $5 518 of property, plant and equipment, which could reduce future earning potential.
Overall, the ratios are showing a decline in liquidity, placing the business in a poor cash position and at risk of defaulting on its debts, particularly with a doubling of tax liability and a high level of accounts payable.
Calculations
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly calculates 4 liquidity ratios | 4 |
Correctly calculates 3 liquidity ratios | 3 |
Correctly calculates 2 liquidity ratios | 2 |
Correctly calculates 1 liquidity ratio | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Conclusion
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
States a valid and justified conclusion on the liquidity of the company AND supports conclusion with four relevant ratios AND identified trends | 4 |
States a valid conclusion on liquidity of the company AND supports conclusion with two or three relevant ratios AND an identified trend | 3 |
Supports conclusion with one relevant ratio AND identifies a trend | 2 |
States a relevant ratio OR identifies a trend | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Liquidity Analysis
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
• provides an analysis of the liquidity of the company | 4 |
• provides an explanation of the liquidity of the company • refers to financial data or information from the stimulus | 3 |
• makes a statement about the liquidity of the company • refers to financial data or information from the stimulus | 2 |
• makes a statement about the liquidity of the company | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Using Stimulus 4, trend analysis and two relevant ratios, analyse and interpret the stability of the company across the four years. Show your working for the ratio calculations.
Reveal Answer
| Ratio | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt ratio Total liab/total assets | 250 565/490 372 = 51.096% | 257 605/519 107 = 49.62% | 200 305/395 720 = 50.62% | 178 776/393 884 = 45.39% |
| Debt to equity ratio Total debt/Total equity | 250 565/239 807 =1.04:1 | 257 605/261 502 = 0.985:1 | 200 305/195 415 = 1.025:1 | 178 776/215 108 = 0.83:1 |
Other plausible ratios that could have been used:
| Ratio | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shareholder equity ratio Total equity/Total assets | 239 807/490 372 = 48.9% | 261 502/519 107 = 50.4% | 195 415/395 720 = 49.4% | 215 108/393 884 = 54.61% |
| Gearing ratio (Provided) | 28% | 22% | 30% | 13% |
Long-term stability for The Supermarket Company is favourable. The reliance on debt to finance assets has increased from 45.39% in 2020 to just over 51% in 2023, due to fluctuations in total assets. As an example, investments were at a low in 2020 ($726 000), rose to $11 377 000 in 2022 and dropped in 2023 closer to the 2020 value. The ratio shows that the funding from external parties has been relatively stable since the rise in 2021 to 50.62% and has remained close to the benchmark of 50%.
While there have been fluctuations in the total non-current assets over the four years, the current assets have shown a marked increase from 2021 to 2022, but then seem to have stabilised. Current liabilities increased from 2021 with rises in interest bearing and tax liabilities.
Accounts payable also increased from 2021 to 2022, but appear to have stabilised since. Non-current liabilities increased in 2022 but were paid down in 2023, as were interest bearing liabilities, contributing to the decrease in 2023 from 2022 in the total value of non-current liabilities.
The Supermarket Company has maintained a relatively constant debt-to-equity ratio close to 1:1 over the four years, so repayments on external funds can be met. The fluctuations discussed above have contributed to the total liabilities balance being relatively stable across the four years. The total equity figure has shown fluctuation in reserves and increases in retained earnings, particularly since 2021, providing evidence of stability.
Calculations
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly calculates one stability ratio | 1 |
Correctly calculates another stability ratio | 1 |
Conclusion
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Provides a valid and justified conclusion about the stability of the company AND supports conclusion with two relevant ratios AND identified trends | 5 |
Provides a valid and justified conclusion about the stability of the company AND supports conclusion with one relevant ratio AND identified trends | 4 |
States a valid conclusion about the stability of the company AND supports conclusion with one relevant ratio AND an identified trend | 3 |
Supports conclusion with a relevant ratio OR trend | 2 |
States a relevant ratio OR trend | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Stability Analysis
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
• provides a detailed analysis of the stability of the company | 5 |
• provides an analysis of the stability of the company | 4 |
• provides an explanation of the stability of the company | 3 |
• makes a statement about the stability of the company | 2 |
• makes a statement about the stability of the company | 1 |
None of the above | 0 |
Evaluate the performance of the company using Stimulus 4 and your analysis from Questions 13a) and 13b) to provide a justified decision and recommendation to the board of directors about the proposed plans.
Reveal Answer
The purchase of local grocery stores by The Supermarket Company should not be considered at this point in time. While stability of The Supermarket Company aligns with benchmarks, the company faces serious short-term liquidity issues. Cash flow is inhibited by a declining inventory turnover, with funds tied up in slow-moving stock. Significant credit policy issues are evident — cash collection rates increased over time, with a 12-day or 40% increase from 2022 to 2023. These trends must be addressed to prevent the company from defaulting on current obligations, particularly its tax liability of $11 724 000 — more than double that of 2022.
The desired expansion may place the company at a greater risk. Therefore, this proposal to purchase local grocery stores cannot be supported in the near future, as it will place even greater debt leverage on The Supermarket Company when it is already facing major liquidity problems.
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Clearly explains the scenario AND makes a clear decision to propose a valid recommendation AND supports recommendation with relevant financial data and information relating to liquidity and stability | 5 |
Explains the scenario AND makes a clear decision to propose a valid recommendation AND supports recommendation with relevant financial data and information relating to liquidity and stability | 4 |
Explains the scenario AND states a valid recommendation AND supports recommendation with financial data or information | 3 |
Makes a statement about the scenario AND states a recommendation AND refers to financial data or information | 2 |
Makes a statement about the scenario OR refers to financial data or information | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Read Case study 2 (Stimulus 2–3) in the stimulus book.
Prepare a fully classified Statement of Profit or Loss to project the profitability of Business 1 at 30 June 2021 after implementing the proposed changes. Round to the nearest dollar.
Business 1
Statement of Projected Profit or Loss for the year ended 30 June 2021
| $ | $ | $ | |
|---|---|---|---|
Reveal Answer
Adjustments
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly identifies the affected accounts and adjusts amounts for 5 accounts | 5 |
Correctly identifies the affected accounts and adjusts amounts for 4 accounts | 4 |
Correctly identifies the affected accounts and adjusts amounts for 3 accounts | 3 |
Correctly identifies the affected accounts and adjusts amounts for 2 accounts | 2 |
Correctly identifies the affected accounts and adjusts amounts for 1 account | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Classification
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly classifies and records revenue and expenses for all 17 accounts | 5 |
Correctly classifies and records revenue and expenses for 14 accounts | 4 |
Correctly classifies and records revenue and expenses for 10 accounts | 3 |
Correctly classifies and records revenue and expenses for 6 accounts | 2 |
Correctly classifies and records revenue and expenses for 3 accounts | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Profit & Statement
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Correctly determines gross and net profit figures | 1 |
Correctly classifies Statement of Profit or Loss | 1 |
List all underlying assumptions you have made in 12a).
Reveal Answer
Depreciation on Vehicle 1 was using the straight-line method.
Purchase of vehicle was paid in cash.
| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
Provides plausible assumptions | 2 |
Provides one plausible assumption | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Use Stimulus 2 and 3 to propose and justify two strategies to fund the purchase of the second delivery vehicle.
Reveal Answer
Actively manage accounts receivable by following up with outstanding amounts. Tighten credit sales policy, e.g. provide incentives for cash sales or early payment (discount). This will also reduce bad debts and administration loads. Currently, accounts receivable are at $52 800, which is 30% of credit sales. Cash collected from outstanding debtors could be used to partially finance the purchase of a new vehicle or purchase a second-hand vehicle.
Sell some or all of the shares held. The shares have a value of $17 000 and are returning 4.2% ($720), so they do not make a high contribution to the overall revenue. They are reported at historical cost, so may be sold at a higher value. The cash flow from selling the shares could be used to partially finance the purchase of a new or used vehicle.
Strategy 1
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
States a first plausible strategy, explains the first strategy, identifies source of funding in this explanation, supports the first strategy with relevant financial data and information | 4 |
States a first plausible strategy, explains this first strategy, refers to the stimulus | 3 |
States a first plausible strategy, explains this first strategy | 2 |
States a first plausible strategy | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |
Strategy 2
Marking Bands| Descriptor | Marks |
|---|---|
States a second plausible strategy, explains this second strategy, identifies source of funding in this explanation, supports this second strategy with relevant financial data and information | 4 |
States a second plausible strategy, explains this second strategy, refers to the stimulus | 3 |
States a second plausible strategy, explains this second strategy | 2 |
States a second plausible strategy | 1 |
Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above | 0 |