QCAA Accounting Performance analysis of a public company

15 sample questions with marking guides and sample answers · Avg. score: 28.6%

Q3
2021
QCAA
1 mark
Q3
1 mark
 EBITDA ($m) for XYZ Company Ltd    
 20172018201920202021
NSW415.3298.2499.5374.7511.9
QLD420.7566.7320.6479.8507.3
WA354.6323.4399.5465.4499.2

Which statement is correct?

A

Western Australia had a 43% growth in EBITDA from 2018 to 2020.

B

XYZ Company Ltd had the most unstable EBITDA trend in 2018.

C

New South Wales had a 28% EBITDA result from 2017 to 2018.

D

Queensland had a total EBITDA of $578.8 m from 2017 to 2021.

Reveal Answer
A

Western Australia had a 43% growth in EBITDA from 2018 to 2020.

Correct Answer

Western Australia's EBITDA grew from $323.4m in 2018 to $465.4m in 2020. The percentage growth is calculated as 465.4323.4323.40.439\frac{465.4 - 323.4}{323.4} \approx 0.439, or roughly 43.9%43.9\%, which aligns with the option.

B

XYZ Company Ltd had the most unstable EBITDA trend in 2018.

Stability is not clearly defined by a single metric in the table, and total company EBITDA remained relatively flat between 2017 ($1,190.6m) and 2018 ($1,188.3m). Without a specific definition or calculation, this subjective statement cannot be confirmed as the correct answer.

C

New South Wales had a 28% EBITDA result from 2017 to 2018.

New South Wales experienced a decrease in EBITDA from 2017 to 2018. The calculation 298.2415.3415.30.282\frac{298.2 - 415.3}{415.3} \approx -0.282 indicates a 28%28\% decline, not a positive 28%28\% result.

D

Queensland had a total EBITDA of $578.8 m from 2017 to 2021.

The total EBITDA for Queensland from 2017 to 2021 is the sum of all years (420.7+566.7+320.6+479.8+507.3420.7 + 566.7 + 320.6 + 479.8 + 507.3), which equals $2,295.1m, significantly higher than $578.8m.

Q6
2021
QCAA
1 mark
Q6
1 mark

To review its performance, a sole trader clothing retail business in Queensland should compare its

A

net profit ratio with clothing retailers listed on the ASX.

B

gross profit ratio with clothing retailers with a similar turnover.

C

cost of goods sold with clothing retailers considered to have world’s best practice.

D

commission revenue with sales revenue for all other Queensland clothing retailers.

Reveal Answer
A

net profit ratio with clothing retailers listed on the ASX.

Comparing a small sole trader to large public companies listed on the ASX is not useful because of the vast differences in scale, capital structure, and operational complexity.

B

gross profit ratio with clothing retailers with a similar turnover.

Correct Answer

Benchmarking against businesses in the same industry with similar turnover provides the most realistic comparison of trading efficiency and performance.

C

cost of goods sold with clothing retailers considered to have world’s best practice.

Comparing a local sole trader to global entities with "world's best practice" is unrealistic, as the sole trader lacks the purchasing power and economies of scale to match those costs.

D

commission revenue with sales revenue for all other Queensland clothing retailers.

Clothing retailers primarily earn income through sales revenue rather than commission revenue, making this comparison irrelevant to the business model.

Q2
2024
QCAA
1 mark
Q2
1 mark

Gross profit and net profit ratios are above industry benchmarks for Company A, and credit sales have increased by 20% on the previous year. However, the net cash flows from operating activities have decreased. This is because

A

cost of goods sold has increased.

B

payment of dividends has increased.

C

inflows have increased proportionally more than outflows.

D

customers buying on credit are not paying their accounts on time.

Reveal Answer
A

cost of goods sold has increased.

An increase in the cost of goods sold would typically lower the gross profit ratio, which contradicts the scenario stating that profit ratios are above industry benchmarks.

B

payment of dividends has increased.

Dividend payments are generally classified as financing activities, not operating activities, so they would not cause a decrease in net cash flows from operating activities.

C

inflows have increased proportionally more than outflows.

If cash inflows increased proportionally more than outflows, the net cash flow would increase, which contradicts the statement that net cash flows have decreased.

D

customers buying on credit are not paying their accounts on time.

Correct Answer

Credit sales are recorded as revenue (increasing profit) immediately, but cash is only received when customers pay; if collections are slow, accounts receivable rise and operating cash flow decreases despite high profitability.

Q7
2024
QCAA
1 mark
Q7
1 mark

The following financial data has been provided for [Box] Ltd.

Extract of accounts
Cash sales220 000
Credit sales270 000
Cost of goods sold170 000
Repairs and maintenance5 000
Sales salaries125 000
Rent expense6 000
Depreciation on delivery vehicles8 000
Rates1 200
Depreciation on building6 000
Office expenses2 000
Amortisation of goodwill4 000
Interest paid23 000
Net profit before tax139 800
Income tax41 940
Net profit after tax97 860

Ltd’s EBITDA margin ratio, rounded to two decimal places, is

A

45.46%

B

43.82%

C

36.90%

D

36.08%

Reveal Answer
A

45.46%

This calculation incorrectly adds Income Tax ($41,940) to Net Profit Before Tax ($139,800). Since the starting profit figure is already before tax, adding the tax expense again is a double-counting error.

B

43.82%

This result is obtained by incorrectly adding Income Tax to Net Profit Before Tax and failing to add back the depreciation on delivery vehicles ($8,000) to the earnings figure.

C

36.90%

Correct Answer

To calculate the EBITDA margin, first determine Total Revenue ($220,000 + $270,000 = $490,000) and EBITDA (Net Profit Before Tax + Interest + Depreciation + Amortisation = $139,800 + $23,000 + $14,000 + $4,000 = $180,800). The ratio is 180,800490,00036.90%\frac{180,800}{490,000} \approx 36.90\%.

D

36.08%

This option incorrectly excludes the Amortisation of goodwill ($4,000) from the EBITDA calculation. EBITDA requires adding back Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortisation to the Net Profit.

Q13
2022
QCAA
10 marks
Q13
10 marks

Read Case study 2 (Stimulus 9–10) in the stimulus book.

Analyse and evaluate the performance of the company to propose two recommendations to improve the profitability of the company.

Reveal Answer

Gross profit ($50.86 m to $36.59 m) and net profit ($78.13 m to $25.11 m) decreased from 2021. The gross margin dropped from 56.79 in 2021 above the industry benchmark of 48.43 to 40.07 in 2022, below the industry benchmark of 47.28. Net profit ratios for both years are consistently above the industry benchmarks of 22.85 and 21.65.
Cost of sales as a percentage of sales has increased by 19.45 percentage points, therefore gross profit has decreased by $14.27 m or 16.72 percentage points. Changing suppliers should be considered to reduce these costs or reduce the amount of stock kept on hand.
Sales have increased by 1% in 2022 yet the cost of these sales has increased by 46% since 2021. Considering increasing sales prices could recoup some costs. Other revenue has increased since 2021 and it may be profitable to increase these items.
Effective management of most expenses resulted in consistent or decreasing costs. The revaluation of investment properties with gains of $63.49 m in 2021 and $13.46 m in 2022 overinflated the net profit figures, particularly in 2021. This explains the positive comparison with industry benchmarks. Without the revaluation, the net profit ratios would be 16.34% (2021) and 12.76% (2022), both below the industry benchmarks.
Employee expenses decreased by $3.77 m, indicating a reduction in staff or movement from casual to permanent positions.
Marketing and administrative expenses have halved, indicating a reduction in spending or change of suppliers.
The profitability of the Motel Company could improve by changing purchasing policies (suppliers and quantities) and increasing selling prices.

Marking Criteria

Analysis

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Provides a detailed analysis of the scenario; supports this analysis with relevant financial data and information from the stimuli

5

Provides an analysis of the scenario; refers to relevant financial data and information from the stimuli

4

Explains the scenario; refers to financial data or information from the stimuli

3

Makes a statement about the scenario; refers to financial data or information from the stimuli

2

Makes a statement about the scenario

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above.

0

Recommendations

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Provides valid and justified decisions, assessing strengths and limitations; proposes two valid recommendations; supports these two recommendations with relevant financial data and information

5

Provides valid decisions; proposes two valid recommendations; supports these recommendations with financial data and information

4

Proposes a valid recommendation; supports this recommendation with financial data or information

3

States a recommendation

2

Infers a recommendation

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above.

0
Q13
2020
QCAA
9 marks
Q13
9 marks

Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 4–6) in the stimulus book.

Bus Company has gradually expanded its fleet to increase the number of routes it can cover. In the financial year ended 30 June 2019, the company finalised its purchase of offices across Queensland. In the 2019–2020 financial year, it completed the expansion of its Queensland routes. The company’s Board of Directors wants to determine the impact of expanding operations into New South Wales.

Evaluate the company’s financial stability in order to support its future expansion.

Propose recommendations for the future operations and direction of the business.

Reveal Answer

A purchase of bank bonds for $99 970 is reflected in non-current assets and the cash flow. This money could have been used to reduce operating costs, attract more passengers and improve profitability.

Deferred tax assets have appeared in 2020. These will offset future tax debts and reduce cash outflows in a future period.

The business has purchased ($145 570) and sold ($62 670) property, plant and equipment during the year, reflecting the expansion of its fleet and offices.

The business is highly geared at 75% against the industry benchmark of 60%, so it would need to issue shares and pay down debt. Finance costs have been growing, supporting the interpretation of the business being highly geared.

Income from operations has dropped by $98 830 from 2019 (see cash receipts from customers, which have reduced by $147 530). Borrowings have increased by $1 156 000. One share issue raised $310 460, so another share issue may be needed to increase cash flow. The share issue has been put towards paying off existing borrowings. More borrowings were needed to help meet the cost of payments for other deposits and for purchases of property, plant and equipment. The current ratio and acid test for the business are below the industry average, indicating liquidity issues.

The company must focus on consolidation in Queensland as a priority before expansion. It should show improvements in liquidity and gearing. Expansion requires extensive capital expenditure with high risk, particularly when considering the drop in operating cash inflows.

Marking Criteria

Analysis

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Clearly explains the scenario, supports this explanation with relevant financial data and information

5

Explains the scenario, refers to relevant financial data and information

4

Explains the scenario, refers to financial data or information

3

Makes a statement about the scenario, refers to financial data or information

2

Makes a statement about the scenario

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above

0

Recommendations

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

States valid recommendations, supports these recommendations with relevant financial data and information

4

States a valid recommendation, supports this recommendation with financial data or information

3

States a recommendation

2

Infers a recommendation

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above

0
Q2
2021
QCAA
1 mark
Q2
1 mark

A times interest earned ratio is used

A

to measure a business’s fixed debt obligations on lease payments.

B

by lenders to ascertain whether a business can afford additional debt.

C

to count net earnings against total outstanding shares over a fixed period of time.

D

to measure financial leverage indicating the degree to which a firm’s operations are funded by equity.

Reveal Answer
A

to measure a business’s fixed debt obligations on lease payments.

This description aligns better with the Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, which includes lease payments, whereas the Times Interest Earned ratio focuses specifically on interest expense.

B

by lenders to ascertain whether a business can afford additional debt.

Correct Answer

Lenders use this solvency ratio to evaluate a company's ability to pay interest expenses from its operating income, helping determine the risk associated with lending additional funds.

C

to count net earnings against total outstanding shares over a fixed period of time.

This describes Earnings Per Share (EPS), which measures profitability per share, not the ability to service debt interest.

D

to measure financial leverage indicating the degree to which a firm’s operations are funded by equity.

This describes a capital structure ratio like the Debt-to-Equity ratio; TIE measures the ability to service debt interest, not the specific proportion of operations funded by equity.

Q4
2020
QCAA
1 mark
Q4
1 mark

Industry benchmarks are useful for

A

analysing the effectiveness of a marketing campaign.

B

explaining variations in financial data across industries.

C

identifying areas of financial performance that can be improved.

D

evaluating the appropriateness of pricing strategies in the local market.

Reveal Answer
A

analysing the effectiveness of a marketing campaign.

Marketing campaigns are typically evaluated using specific internal metrics (like ROI or conversion rates) relative to campaign goals, rather than general industry financial benchmarks.

B

explaining variations in financial data across industries.

Benchmarks are designed for comparisons within the same industry; comparing financial data across different industries is often invalid due to fundamental structural differences in business models.

C

identifying areas of financial performance that can be improved.

Correct Answer

Benchmarking allows a company to compare its financial ratios and performance metrics against industry averages to identify weaknesses and pinpoint specific areas where performance lags behind competitors.

D

evaluating the appropriateness of pricing strategies in the local market.

Pricing is highly dependent on local competition and specific value propositions, making broad industry benchmarks less useful for this specific purpose than targeted local market analysis.

Q13
2023
QCAA
29 marks
Q13

Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 4) in the stimulus book.

The Supermarket Company is considering expansion through the purchase of local grocery stores in regional Queensland towns in the next financial year. The board of directors has approached you with their comparative financial statements for analysis and evaluation, and is seeking your advice on the feasibility of the proposed expansion plans.

Q13a
12 marks

Using four relevant ratios, analyse and interpret the liquidity of The Supermarket Company across the financial years 2022 and 2023. Show your working for the ratio calculations.

Reveal Answer

Current ratio
Current assets/current liabilities
=210465/181996=1.16= 210 465/181 996 = 1.16
=221573/169305=1.31= 221 573/169 305 = 1.31

Quick Asset ratio:
Current assets –(Inventories + Prepayments)/current liabilities
=210465130782/181996=79685/181996=0.44= 210 465 – 130 782/181 996 = 79 685/181 996 = 0.44
=221573124701/169305=96872/169305=0.57= 221 573 – 124 701/169 305 = 96 872/169 305 = 0.57

Turnover of inventories
CoGS/Av inventories
=1089921/((124701+130780)/2)=1089921/127741= 1 089 921/((124 701 + 130 780)/2) = 1 089 921/127 741
=8.53= 8.53 times p.a. or 365/8.53=42.79365/8.53 = 42.79 days
=1512885/((86272+124701)/2)=1512885/105487= 1 512 885/((86 272 + 124 701)/2) = 1 512 885/105 487
=14.34= 14.34 times p.a. or 365/14.34=25.45365/14.34 = 25.45 days

A/c Receivable turnover
Net Credit Sales/Av Accts Receivable
=713132/((91360+71174)/2)=713132/81267= 713 132/((91 360 + 71 174)/2) = 713 132/81 267
=8.775= 8.775 times p.a. or 365/8.775=41.595365/8.775 = 41.595 days
=951585/((64635+91360)/2)=951585/77998= 951 585/((64 635 + 91 360)/2) = 951 585/77 998
=12.2= 12.2 times p.a. or 365/12.2=29.91365/12.2 = 29.91 days

Total sales have decreased from $1 676 801 in 2022 to $1 256 621 in 2023 — a decrease of 25%. Further, there has been a decline in the rate of collection of cash from credit customers from 30 days in 2022 to 42 days in 2023. This signifies serious issues with the credit policies of the business. The turnover of inventories has increased from 25 days (2022) to 43 days (2023), indicating that inventories are taking longer to sell.

Current ratios are below the benchmark of 2:1 and worsening, with a decrease from 1.31 in 2022 to 1.16 in 2023. This indicates a poor ability to cover current debts with current assets, especially with accounts receivable collections slower and interest bearing short-term liabilities increasing.

The Quick ratio has also worsened from 2022 to 2023, reflecting increasing inability to meet immediate debts and results are less than the benchmark of 1:1. This reflects the drop in current assets, notably accounts receivables, while current liabilities have increased since 2022. There has been an increase in cash and cash equivalents, but that would seem to have been influenced by the sale of $10 500 in investments and $5 518 of property, plant and equipment, which could reduce future earning potential.

Overall, the ratios are showing a decline in liquidity, placing the business in a poor cash position and at risk of defaulting on its debts, particularly with a doubling of tax liability and a high level of accounts payable.

Marking Criteria

Calculations

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Correctly calculates 4 liquidity ratios

4

Correctly calculates 3 liquidity ratios

3

Correctly calculates 2 liquidity ratios

2

Correctly calculates 1 liquidity ratio

1

None of the above

0

Conclusion

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

States a valid and justified conclusion on the liquidity of the company AND supports conclusion with four relevant ratios AND identified trends

4

States a valid conclusion on liquidity of the company AND supports conclusion with two or three relevant ratios AND an identified trend

3

Supports conclusion with one relevant ratio AND identifies a trend

2

States a relevant ratio OR identifies a trend

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above

0

Liquidity Analysis

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

• provides an analysis of the liquidity of the company
• identifies relevant relationships
• refers to relevant financial data and information from the stimulus

4

• provides an explanation of the liquidity of the company • refers to financial data or information from the stimulus

3

• makes a statement about the liquidity of the company • refers to financial data or information from the stimulus

2

• makes a statement about the liquidity of the company

1

None of the above

0
Q13b
12 marks

Using Stimulus 4, trend analysis and two relevant ratios, analyse and interpret the stability of the company across the four years. Show your working for the ratio calculations.

Reveal Answer

Ratio2023202220212020
Debt ratio
Total liab/total assets
250 565/490 372
= 51.096%
257 605/519 107
= 49.62%
200 305/395 720
= 50.62%
178 776/393 884
= 45.39%
Debt to equity ratio
Total debt/Total equity
250 565/239 807
=1.04:1
257 605/261 502
= 0.985:1
200 305/195 415
= 1.025:1
178 776/215 108
= 0.83:1

Other plausible ratios that could have been used:

Ratio2023202220212020
Shareholder equity ratio
Total equity/Total assets
239 807/490 372
= 48.9%
261 502/519 107
= 50.4%
195 415/395 720
= 49.4%
215 108/393 884
= 54.61%
Gearing ratio (Provided)28%22%30%13%

Long-term stability for The Supermarket Company is favourable. The reliance on debt to finance assets has increased from 45.39% in 2020 to just over 51% in 2023, due to fluctuations in total assets. As an example, investments were at a low in 2020 ($726 000), rose to $11 377 000 in 2022 and dropped in 2023 closer to the 2020 value. The ratio shows that the funding from external parties has been relatively stable since the rise in 2021 to 50.62% and has remained close to the benchmark of 50%.

While there have been fluctuations in the total non-current assets over the four years, the current assets have shown a marked increase from 2021 to 2022, but then seem to have stabilised. Current liabilities increased from 2021 with rises in interest bearing and tax liabilities.

Accounts payable also increased from 2021 to 2022, but appear to have stabilised since. Non-current liabilities increased in 2022 but were paid down in 2023, as were interest bearing liabilities, contributing to the decrease in 2023 from 2022 in the total value of non-current liabilities.

The Supermarket Company has maintained a relatively constant debt-to-equity ratio close to 1:1 over the four years, so repayments on external funds can be met. The fluctuations discussed above have contributed to the total liabilities balance being relatively stable across the four years. The total equity figure has shown fluctuation in reserves and increases in retained earnings, particularly since 2021, providing evidence of stability.

Marking Criteria

Calculations

DescriptorMarks

Correctly calculates one stability ratio

1

Correctly calculates another stability ratio

1

Conclusion

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Provides a valid and justified conclusion about the stability of the company AND supports conclusion with two relevant ratios AND identified trends

5

Provides a valid and justified conclusion about the stability of the company AND supports conclusion with one relevant ratio AND identified trends

4

States a valid conclusion about the stability of the company AND supports conclusion with one relevant ratio AND an identified trend

3

Supports conclusion with a relevant ratio OR trend

2

States a relevant ratio OR trend

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above

0

Stability Analysis

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

• provides a detailed analysis of the stability of the company
• identifies relevant relationships
• supports analysis with relevant relationships drawn from financial data and information in the stimulus

5

• provides an analysis of the stability of the company
• identifies relevant relationships
• refers to relevant financial data and information in the stimulus

4

• provides an explanation of the stability of the company
• refers to financial data or information in the stimulus

3

• makes a statement about the stability of the company
• refers to financial data or information in the stimulus

2

• makes a statement about the stability of the company

1

None of the above

0
Q13c
5 marks

Evaluate the performance of the company using Stimulus 4 and your analysis from Questions 13a) and 13b) to provide a justified decision and recommendation to the board of directors about the proposed plans.

Reveal Answer

The purchase of local grocery stores by The Supermarket Company should not be considered at this point in time. While stability of The Supermarket Company aligns with benchmarks, the company faces serious short-term liquidity issues. Cash flow is inhibited by a declining inventory turnover, with funds tied up in slow-moving stock. Significant credit policy issues are evident — cash collection rates increased over time, with a 12-day or 40% increase from 2022 to 2023. These trends must be addressed to prevent the company from defaulting on current obligations, particularly its tax liability of $11 724 000 — more than double that of 2022.

The desired expansion may place the company at a greater risk. Therefore, this proposal to purchase local grocery stores cannot be supported in the near future, as it will place even greater debt leverage on The Supermarket Company when it is already facing major liquidity problems.

Marking Criteria
DescriptorMarks

Clearly explains the scenario AND makes a clear decision to propose a valid recommendation AND supports recommendation with relevant financial data and information relating to liquidity and stability

5

Explains the scenario AND makes a clear decision to propose a valid recommendation AND supports recommendation with relevant financial data and information relating to liquidity and stability

4

Explains the scenario AND states a valid recommendation AND supports recommendation with financial data or information

3

Makes a statement about the scenario AND states a recommendation AND refers to financial data or information

2

Makes a statement about the scenario OR refers to financial data or information

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above

0
Q13
2024
QCAA
10 marks
Q13
10 marks

Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 5–6) in the stimulus book.

Use horizontal analysis to analyse and evaluate the financial data and information. Make recommendations to the board of directors about whether they should progress with the expansion.

Reveal Answer

XYZ Catering Company’s net profit has decreased to $59 173 in 2023. Total revenue increased by 1.35%, while expenses increased by 1.98%. This has resulted in a decrease of 13 cents in EPS and ROE decreasing from 18.2% to 16.2%.

The 84.3% decrease in Other income from $3 254 to $511 has negatively impacted profitability. Reasons could include a reduction in interest revenue due to decreases in cash and equivalents, and/or financial asset investments.

If the expansion proceeds, inventories costs may increase significantly to stock the additional equipment. Liquidity should not be negatively impacted, as inventories could be funded from cash and cash equivalents.

Trade and other receivables have increased $23 102. Further credit sales could increase the risk of bad debts. If liquidity and cash flow are not monitored closely, payment of trade and other payables, which have increased $22 466, could be further impacted.

If equipment is sold, as well as leased, the possible decrease in lease revenue could be offset somewhat if the business moves into repairs and maintenance of equipment that has been sold.

The board should proceed with the expansion, especially given the success of the trial. Once established, additional sales should increase net profit. The introduction of a tight credit policy is recommended to ensure prompt payment is received from trade and other receivables. This should result in an improved cash position, a reduction in bad debts and the ability to pay trade and other payables in a timely manner to maintain an excellent business reputation.

Notes

Valid: sound, well-founded; legitimate and able to be supported.
Relevant financial data and information may include:

Profitability

  • net profit ratio
  • NP/net sales x 100
  • 2023: 62707677378×100=9.26%\frac{62\,707}{677\,378} \times 100 = 9.26\%
  • 2024: 59173686496×100=8.62%\frac{59\,173}{686\,496} \times 100 = 8.62\%
  • ROE: is provided in stimulus

Liquidity

  • Current ratio
  • 2023: 580316401724=1.44:1\frac{580\,316}{401\,724} = 1.44:1
  • 2024: 599436419204=1.43:1\frac{599\,436}{419\,204} = 1.43:1
  • Turnover of a/c receivable
  • 2024: 678811(172353+1954552)=3.69\frac{678\,811}{(172\,353 + \frac{195\,455}{2})} = 3.69 times or 99 days approximately

Stability

  • Equity: 45%
  • Liabilities: 55%

Other relevant relationships/trends/ratios may include:

  • current tax receivables increased by 169.26% or $2 544
  • investment in joint ventures increased by 331.94% or $12 741
  • PPE increased by 18.48% or $10 245
  • intangibles increased by 5.34% or $6 131
  • trade and other payables increased by 6.1% or $22 466
  • borrowings increased by 65.81% or $8 447
  • or other suitable response consistent with a reasonable understanding.
Marking Criteria

Analysis

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Provides a detailed horizontal analysis of the scenario; supports this analysis with relevant financial data and information from Stimulus 5 and 6; provides valid and justified decisions; proposes two valid recommendations; supports these two recommendations with relevant financial data and information

5

Provides a horizontal analysis of the scenario; refers to relevant financial data and information from Stimulus 5 and 6; provides a valid decision; proposes two valid recommendations; supports these two recommendations with financial data and information

4

Explains the scenario; refers to financial data or information from Stimulus 5 and 6; provides a valid decision; proposes a valid recommendation; supports this recommendation with financial data or information

3

Makes a statement about the scenario; refers to financial data or information from Stimulus 5 or 6; makes a decision; proposes a recommendation

2

Makes a statement about the scenario; states a recommendation or decision

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors above.

0

Decisions

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

provides valid and justified decisions
proposes two valid recommendations
supports these two recommendations with relevant financial data and information

5

provides a valid decision
proposes two valid recommendations
supports these two recommendations with financial data and information

4

provides a valid decision
proposes a valid recommendation
supports this recommendation with financial data or information

3

makes a decision
proposes a recommendation

2

states a recommendation or decision

1

None of the above

0
Q10
2020
QCAA
1 mark
Q10
1 mark

A public company’s turnover of accounts receivable is 45 days. The industry average is 30 days. The company most likely has

A

a lenient credit policy.

B

high demand for stock.

C

strict credit sales protocols.

D

poor internal controls over creditors.

Reveal Answer
A

a lenient credit policy.

Correct Answer

A collection period of 45 days is longer than the industry average of 30 days, indicating the company takes longer to collect cash. This suggests a lenient credit policy where customers are given more time to pay or credit is extended to slower-paying customers.

B

high demand for stock.

High demand for stock primarily affects inventory turnover, not accounts receivable turnover. It does not explain why customers are taking longer than average to settle their debts.

C

strict credit sales protocols.

Strict credit protocols typically result in faster collections and a lower days sales outstanding (DSO) figure. If protocols were strict, the turnover days would likely be lower than or equal to the industry average.

D

poor internal controls over creditors.

This option refers to "creditors" (accounts payable/liabilities), but the metric in question is accounts receivable (assets). Poor controls over collections from customers (debtors) would be relevant, but controls over creditors are not.

Q4
2021
QCAA
1 mark
Q4
1 mark

The shareholder equity ratio is used by external stakeholders to determine

A

the extent to which a company’s profit is affected by shareholder contributions.

B

the total amount owed to shareholders on liquidation.

C

how much of a company’s assets shareholders own.

D

the return on dividends provided to shareholders.

Reveal Answer
A

the extent to which a company’s profit is affected by shareholder contributions.

This option describes profitability metrics like Return on Equity (ROE), whereas the shareholder equity ratio is a solvency ratio that measures financial leverage rather than profit sensitivity.

B

the total amount owed to shareholders on liquidation.

The ratio expresses a percentage or proportion of financing, not a total monetary amount. Additionally, the book value of equity used in this ratio rarely equals the actual cash value realized during liquidation.

C

how much of a company’s assets shareholders own.

Correct Answer

The shareholder equity ratio is calculated as Total EquityTotal Assets\frac{\text{Total Equity}}{\text{Total Assets}}, which indicates the proportion of the company's assets that are financed by shareholders (owned free of debt) rather than by creditors.

D

the return on dividends provided to shareholders.

This refers to metrics like dividend yield or the dividend payout ratio. The shareholder equity ratio analyzes the balance sheet structure, not the returns generated from dividends.

Q8
2023
QCAA
1 mark
Q8
1 mark

Information on a company’s shareholdings is provided.

 2023
Shareholder’s equity (10 365 shares @ $2.40 per share)$24 876.00
Reserves$12 160.00
Retained earnings$16 873.00
Market value per share$3.12
Dividends paid$20 146.00

What is the dividend yield ratio?

A

0.51

B

0.62

C

0.77

D

0.81

Reveal Answer
A

0.51

This option is incorrect and results from a calculation error or misapplication of the dividend yield formula.

B

0.62

Correct Answer

The dividend yield is calculated as Dividend per Share divided by Market Value per Share. First, find the dividend per share: 20,146/10,365=1.94$20,146 / 10,365 = $1.94. Then, divide by the market price: 1.94/3.120.62$1.94 / $3.12 \approx 0.62.

C

0.77

This represents the ratio of the book value per share to the market value per share (2.40/3.120.77$2.40 / $3.12 \approx 0.77), rather than the dividend yield.

D

0.81

This figure is obtained by dividing the total dividends by the total share capital (20,146/24,8760.81$20,146 / $24,876 \approx 0.81) or the dividend per share by the book value per share, instead of using the market value.

Q9
2022
QCAA
1 mark
Q9
1 mark

Statement of Cash Flows (extract)

 202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities   
Receipts from customers4 601 2354 448 7354 520 184
Payments to suppliers–1 752 378–1 716 713–1 744 982
Payments to employees–1 811 978–1 540 181–1 463 172
Interest and other costs of finance–18 458–7 565–14 162
Income taxes paid–98 000–80 306–79 448
Net cash flows from operating activities920 4211 103 9701 218 420
    
Cash flow ratio0.200.250.27

A trend analysis of the extract of Statement of Cash Flows indicates

A

a failure to tighten credit policies

B

a reduction in the amount owing to lenders

C

an increase in the number of staff employed and/or wage rates

D

an improvement in the business’s ability to meet long-term debts

Reveal Answer
A

a failure to tighten credit policies

Receipts from customers actually increased in the most recent year (2022). Without total sales figures to calculate accounts receivable turnover, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that credit policies have failed.

B

a reduction in the amount owing to lenders

Interest and finance costs increased significantly in 2022 (from 7,565 to 18,458), which suggests an increase in debt levels or interest rates rather than a reduction in the amount owing.

C

an increase in the number of staff employed and/or wage rates

Correct Answer

The data shows a substantial and consistent increase in 'Payments to employees' over the three years (from 1,463,172 to 1,811,978), which is directly caused by hiring more staff or increasing wage rates.

D

an improvement in the business’s ability to meet long-term debts

The cash flow ratio decreased steadily from 0.27 to 0.20, and net operating cash flows declined, indicating a deterioration rather than an improvement in the ability to service debts.

Q13
2021
QCAA
17 marks
Q13

Read Case study 3 (Stimulus 7–8) in the stimulus book.

In 2019, Business 3 expanded into India.

Q13a
9 marks

Using Stimulus 7, evaluate the profitability of Business 3 for the year ended 30 June 2021. Propose recommendations regarding the future operations and direction of the business.

Reveal Answer

Operating profit has increased by $47 467 since 2020, indicating that the expansion into India was positive. An increase in marketing expenses and a 102.74% increase in sales is consistent with this, indicating that current marketing strategies have been effective.

Control over gross profit is reflected by a relatively constant gross profit ratio of 47.98% and 50.34%. While the cost of sales has increased by $57 425 from 2020 to 2021, as a proportion of sales, it has improved in 2021.

The significant increase in interest income from 2020 to 2021 could allow funding for future strategies to increase market share in India.

EPS increased 14.34 cents per share in 2021, so for every issued share, more earnings are made by shareholders. This is consistent with the company’s increasing profitability.

Another factor that had an impact on profit included an increase in total assets from $95 463 in 2019 to $240 859 in 2021. This aligns with an increased potential to generate revenue from an increased asset base, and with the company’s expansion into India. There has also been an increase in the tax expense, which is in line with increasing profitability.

The marked upward trend in profitability indicates that an increase in the Indian market share, without compromising the Australian market share, would be beneficial. The expansion has had a positive outcome for the company. The company should maintain its successful control over its cost of sales and continue with its highly effective marketing strategies.

Marking Criteria

Analysis

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Clearly explains the scenario; supports this explanation with relevant financial data and information

5

Explains the scenario; refers to relevant financial data and information

4

Explains the scenario; refers to financial data or information

3

Makes a statement about the scenario; refers to financial data or information

2

Makes a statement about the scenario or refers to financial data or information

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors.

0

Recommendation

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Makes clear decisions to propose valid recommendations; supports these recommendations with relevant financial data and information

4

States a valid recommendation; supports this recommendation with financial data or information

3

States a recommendation

2

Infers a recommendation

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors.

0
Q13b
8 marks

Analyse Stimulus 8 using trend analysis to determine the business’s stability and liquidity.

Reveal Answer

The principal source of cash is derived from operations ($77 036 in 2021, $24 986 in 2020 and $33 315 in 2019) against net cash flows of $72 484 in 2021, $13 138 in 2020 and $17 516 in 2019.

The cash generating power ratio of .97 is ahead of the industry benchmark of .65, indicating that cash flow from operations contributes at a level that is significantly higher than cash inflows from investing and financing to cash reserves. There is a trend of staying ahead of the industry benchmark. Of the total receipts from customers, 25% are converted to operating cash flows.

The trend shows that from entry into India in 2019 to the latest results, the operating cash flow ratio has significantly improved, with the increase from 0.06 to 0.25 showing improved liquidity. The net cash flow dollar result supports this conclusion, with $77 036 being an increase of $43 722 from 2019, when the company started in India.

The company is benefiting from past investments in Listed Investments ($12 169 in 2020 and $16 226 in 2019), with interest income increasing.

With its performance ahead of industry benchmarks, the business is in a good financial position in terms of its liquidity, and the growth in receipts from customers supports its stability.

Marking Criteria

Analysis

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

Clearly explains the scenario; supports this explanation with relevant financial data and information

5

Explains the scenario; refers to relevant financial data and information

4

Explains the scenario; refers to financial data or information

3

Makes a statement about the scenario; refers to financial data or information

2

Makes a statement about the scenario or refers to financial data or information

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors.

0

Conclusion

Marking Bands
DescriptorMarks

States a valid conclusion; supports this conclusion with relevant financial data and information

3

States a conclusion about the liquidity or stability of the company; supports this conclusion with financial data and information

2

States a conclusion about the liquidity or stability of the company

1

Does not satisfy any of the descriptors.

0

Frequently Asked Questions

How many QCAA Accounting questions cover Performance analysis of a public company?
AusGrader has 46 QCAA Accounting questions on Performance analysis of a public company, all with instant AI grading and detailed marking feedback.

Ready to practise QCAA Accounting?

Get instant AI feedback on past exam questions, aligned to the syllabus

Start Practising Free